Browsing by Author "Panimboza López, Karla Sharis"
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Análisis de la influencia de la Sentencia No. 17-21-CN/23 y la interpretación condicionada por parte del pleno de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador(Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Carrera de Derecho, 2025-03-21) Panimboza López, Karla Sharis; Acosta Morales, María GabrielaSexual violence is a problem of general interest that affects the most vulnerable members of society, such as persons with disabilities, who are frequently victims of sexual crimes such as rape, since this group has been prevented from appropriating their sexuality and for whom investigations are scarce. The objective of the study is to analyze from a legal and dogmatic perspective the Sentence No. 17-21-CN/23 of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador to establish the applicability of the proportionality of the interpretation of this type of crime and adjust it to the needs and reality of victims with disabilities unable to show resistance. The importance of dealing with this problem lies in the fact of giving visibility to an illegal conduct that violates the rights of integrity and sexual freedom of a priority group. The research approach is explanatory, using a qualitative methodology, which allows the bibliographic and jurisprudential study, together with the application of interviews to Judges and Prosecutors of the province of Tungurahua, this allows to collect the causes and effects of the legal problem, so it is immersed within the research line of public policy, law and society. The main result evidence that, although the examined sentence demands a personalized treatment in the imputation of the crime of rape, the actions of the judicial officials overlook what was ruled by the Constitutional Court, violating the rights of integrity and sexual freedom of persons with disabilities. In conclusion, the study underscores the need for greater control of compliance with constitutional jurisprudence on the part of justice administrators and a stronger state commitment to the implementation of public policies aimed at sex education and social integration of persons with disabilities.