Maestría en Derecho Penal y Procesal Penal
Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://repositorio.uta.edu.ec/handle/123456789/29523
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item Prisión preventiva y el principio de proporcionalidad(Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Posgrado, Maestría en Derecho penal y Procesal penal, 2019-07) Serrano Abraham, Maria Eugenia; Benavides Benalcázar, Merck MilkoIn Ecuadorian legislation, as in the international treaties and agreements ratified by Ecuador, preventive detention is a precautionary measure of a personal and exceptional nature, because it restricts the right to freedom of the person. The Organic Code of Comprehensive Criminal COIP, provides for preventive detention under Article 534, establishing the requirements that must concur for it to be ordered, these being: elements of conviction that demonstrate the crime for which it is being charged, elements on intervention the defendant, they must be clear and precise, evidence to justify that the other precautionary measures are insufficient to guarantee the appearance in the trial of the defendant and that the crime is punishable by a penalty of more than one year. Likewise, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has pointed out that it is important that alternative personal measures be rationalized, since the indiscriminate application of preventive detention contributes to increasing the levels of prison overcrowding, a feature that is characteristic of Latin American countries. Precisely, the principle of proportionality established in the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador is the ideal mechanism that allows the judge to impose a precautionary measure observing due process. This study addresses the importance of the effective application of this principle, so that preventive detention meets a true legal nature and does not become a prejudgment or an anticipated penalty.Item Cadena de custodia: valoración de prueba y tutela judicial efectiva en el procedimiento adversarial penal(Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Posgrado, Maestría en Derecho penal y Procesal penal, 2019-06) Falconí Gaibor, Sonia Paulina; Recalde Suaréz, Raúl RomanoBecause Ecuador is a constitutional State of rights, it has implicit in its actions, guarantee, protection and security, in the execution of the rights of citizens within a certain process. Since the issuance of the Constitution of 2008, fundamental rights of mandatory application were established, among them effective judicial protection, which is activated by the administrators of justice at the moment in which a cause comes to their knowledge. As judges, they are obliged to carry out an adequate evaluation of evidence within the processes, even more in the criminal sphere, where the freedom of the people is at stake; the evidence obtained, acted upon and legally incorporated into the process, constitutes the basis of the judge's decision, the documentary, testimonial and especially the expert evidence, allow him to know the procedural truth that must be concordant with historical or material truth. If the test is the basis of the judging system, it must have been obtained in an appropriate manner, without violation of the Constitution or laws, which would turn it into illegal, illegal, irregular evidence, etc., in order that the It is enough to sustain the decision of the judge, that is why.Item La prenvención y erradicación de la violencia contra las mujeres y la vulneración del debido proceso legal, en la garantia a ser juzgado por un juez competente e imparcial(Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Posgrado, Maestría en Derecho penal y Procesal penal, 2019-06) Ruiz Abad, Carolina Fernanda; Garzón Villacrés, Iván ArsenioIn this paper we will study how with the coming into force of the new Law to Prevent and Eradicate Violence Against Woman, in advance LOIPEVCM, constitutional guarantees of great importance are violated, such as being judged by a Judge who is competent, impartial and specialized inside family violence subjet. Competent judge, is one who acts by legal mandate, because the competence is born from the law, with what justice administrators are enabled to act in specific cases. COFJ (2009) At present, negative conflicts of competence have been generated and continue to arise between Judges of Criminal Guarantees and Judges of Violence against Woman, since competition has not been fully established in the mentioned LOIPEVCM. Impartial Judge, because the Judge must decide in merit of what was done in the process, without favoring any parties COFJ (2009), the new law violates this guarantee by reforming both the Código Orgánico Integral Penal, in advance COIP and the Código Orgánico de la Función Judicial, in advance COFJ, in this sense the same Judges of Violence must be who know all the stages of the criminal process in femicide crimes and violence against woman and members of the family nucleus. Finally Specialized Judge, the one who acts by reason of the area of his competence. COFJ (2009), this a constitutional guarantee provided in art. 81 of the Constitution (2008) for the treatment of infractions, againt woman and members of the family nucleus, judges must be specialized people in order to know and resolve this type of infractions. With Resolution 11-18 of the National Court of Justice, once again attempted against this principle by removing the Violence Judges competence, so that they can not know the stage of judging the mentioned crimes. The lack of competent, impartial and specialized judges in matters of violence, violates constitutional guarantees and rights that assist both victims and defendants, therefore it needs a legal reform in the area of competence that logically will be stablished in a clear and precise manner to whom impartial and specialized judicial authority corresponds the knowledge of the infractions of violence against woman and members of the family nucleus.