Producción y calidad nutritiva de avena (Arrenatherium elatius) de corte e hidropónica bajo el efecto de dosis de siembra y tiempo de cosecha

Abstract

The production of forages in a conventional way today has had a series of limitation saffecting the livestock area of small, medium and large producers, that is why in the present study it is the "Production and nutritional quality of oats (Arrenatherium elatius) of cutting and hydroponics under the effect of sowing dose and harvest time ”in which a 3x3x3 experimental design was used, where 3 treatments were carried outwith 3 repetitions with 3 sowing doses and harvest times in oats (Arrenatherium elatius). An analysis of variance (ADEVA) and the comparison of Turkey means at 5% were jointly carried out using the Infostat Statistical Software. The distribution ofthe treatments was as follows: T1 Cut oats (Control) with sowing dose (0.150, 0.200 and 0.250Kg / m2) and harvest time (45.60 and 75 days), T2 Greenhydropic forage with solution nutrient with sowing doses (1.5, 3.0 and 4.5Kg / m2) and harvest time (8, 12, 16 days) and T3 Hydroponic green forage without solution with sowingdoses (1.5, 3.0 and 4.5Kg / m2) and the harvest time (8, 12, 16 days). Where the study variables were the germination percentage, plant height, seed weight (biomass) and the final weight of hydroponic forage and cutting (yield). The conditions in which theT1 is developedfavored its morphological development, its yield was high in relationto the height, so the cutting time and the sowing quantity benefited it, in the same way,it showed greater advantagein the weight of the forage. The most prominent treatmentwas D1C3 (0.15 kg / m2 - 75 days)where the development time favored the amount of matter. While in hydroponic production with and without solution, there were no significant differences in the height of the plant, butin relation to weight, T2 showed a greater advantage to weight compared to T3, A others withrespect to the nutritionalvalue of oats ( Arrenathetium elatius) the most prominent values in protein, fat, and fiber in general is hydroponic oats, there are no significant differences between T2 andT3, however the variable fat percentage can be seen as an advantage in T2 with C1 (time of harvest 8 days). Finally, Q2 presented a better benefit / cost ratio for every dollar invested, 0.44 cents has been recovered. Thus, concluding that the production of hydroponic green forage under the effect of sowing doses and harvest times influenced the productive indices.